Comment | Adding stories while leveling the ground is childish

Author without image icon
build installation hub
September 3, 2026
3 min

“If you want to teach a child to ride a bike, you have to give them time.” That’s what architect Reimar von Meding said last week on Radio 1, in response to a much-discussed report by the Economic Institute for Construction (EIB). The study shows that adding stories, subdividing, and renovating old buildings yields far fewer new homes than hoped for.

“That ‘add-on’ kid is just getting started,” was what the director of KAW—which, in its fifty years of existence, has never built a single house outside the city—meant to say. The man behind the slogan “build ten new cities within the city” primarily highlights the benefits of expanding existing buildings, adding stories, and building basements. Not only does it save new residents a long bike ride to the dance club or the neighborhood supermarket, but according to “Mr. Densification,” it’s also a lot more sustainable.

“That may be true,” the EIB argues, “but the numbers that were once promised are simply disappointing.” “Growth was promised, but the figures are plummeting.” Its message? You can’t solve the housing crisis within the existing city. That’s wishful thinking. A pipe dream.

EIB Director Taco van Hoek and his colleagues make no secret of their desire to have children. They are once again advising the government to build additional housing on the outskirts of cities. “It’s a piece of cake,” says Van Hoek.

You might question that last point, because this “add-on-a-little-street” rhetoric has been around for quite some time. Opinions on its potential are just as divided, and that ambition, too, has not been realized so far. What’s more, on average, it takes ten years before the first shovel hits the ground on a new construction project. In a word: great.

In The Hague, the officials in charge of building-up and subdivision are getting grumpy about it. “What’s this new hassle we’re dealing with now?” they wonder at the Ministry of the Interior. They’re questioning Taco’s calculations and reportedly scrutinizing the figures down to three decimal places to make sure they’re correct.

That’s too much credit. Because even if the EIB is right, what exactly is it saying? Exactly. Adding stories, subdividing, and transforming buildings isn’t easy. In fact, it’s complicated, puts our parking regulations in a bind, and, on top of that, there’s always at least one resident in a homeowners’ association (VVE) who, all on their own, manages to derail plans for additional housing on the roof. Simply because the legislature supports that one individual in doing so.

“What a shame,” says Bram Hertzberger, co-founder of Creative City Solutions, in the episode of the Bureau Stoer podcast set to go online Tuesday. He notes that the number of rooftop expansion projects for his company has actually doubled and points out the enormous opportunities for industrial builders.

But the crux of his argument is that such adding stories also generates value, which allows cash-strapped housing associations and homeowners’ associations to address overdue maintenance and energy poverty. A study by the Vereniging Eigen Huis and the Kadaster (2025) shows that one in five homeowners’ associations in the Netherlands is strapped for cash. In other words, 18 percent (approximately 24,000 homeowners’ associations) lack sufficient reserves for “urgent” maintenance, such as facade or roof renovations. “Add two stories, and you can clear up all these kinds of backlogs,” says Hertzberger.

The EIB turns a blind eye to this. Apparently, the research institute isn’t very sympathetic toward people who don’t have a penny to their name—or who have been waiting years for a home because total housing construction is lagging behind the goals.

All right. Van Hoek wants to pick up the pace, too. Add some streets. And maybe they aren’t listening to him enough—that could be the case. But to use that as a reason to subdivide, transform, and add stories—only to tear them down—is unnecessary and unwise at a time when every extra home makes a difference. Or rather: childish.

Read also

 
Logo Construction and Installation Hub
This is an article from Construction and Installation Hub. Want to keep up with all the news from the construction and installation industry? Then take a look at the hub and sign up for the online community.
↗